Oral cleft lip or palate proto

General Details:

Name:
Oral cleft lip or palate proto
Steward:
PhenX
Definition:
These interviewer-administered questions ask the subject or biological parents of a child with cleft lip or palate for a description of the orofacial defects present, the extent of the defect, and if another family member has been diagnosed with the same condition. This protocol is administered by an interviewer asking questions of a subject or of an informant (usually a parent) if the subject is a young child. Question 1 should be asked as written. If the answer is not "no," then the LAHSHAL (Lip, Alveolus, Hard palate, Soft palate, Hard palate, Alveolus, Lip) is completed to characterize the defect. Then the LAHSHAL is completed from the perspective of the interviewer looking at the subject (i.e., right to left). The "? - unknown" variable should only be filled in if the interviewer has exhausted all other means to obtain this data. For each of the five components, fill in a bubble next to appropriate code (ACIX?*) - key provided. Many cleft defects are evident to the interviewer, but still the subject or the informant should be asked about each part of the defect (lip, alveolus, hard palate, and soft palate). Record a cleft uvula as a microform cleft of the soft palate. A cleft in the alveolus in addition to cleft palate should be recorded as a "cleft lip and palate." Question 2 is also asked of each subject (or informant regarding the subject) even if the subject does not have an orofacial cleft.
Registration Status:
Qualified

Designations:

Designation:
Oral cleft lip or palate proto
Tags:
Short Name
Designation:
PhenX - oral health - existence of cleft lip or palate protocol 080501
Tags:
Long Common Name

Designations:

Definition:
These interviewer-administered questions ask the subject or biological parents of a child with cleft lip or palate for a description of the orofacial defects present, the extent of the defect, and if another family member has been diagnosed with the same condition. This protocol is administered by an interviewer asking questions of a subject or of an informant (usually a parent) if the subject is a young child. Question 1 should be asked as written. If the answer is not "no," then the LAHSHAL (Lip, Alveolus, Hard palate, Soft palate, Hard palate, Alveolus, Lip) is completed to characterize the defect. Then the LAHSHAL is completed from the perspective of the interviewer looking at the subject (i.e., right to left). The "? - unknown" variable should only be filled in if the interviewer has exhausted all other means to obtain this data. For each of the five components, fill in a bubble next to appropriate code (ACIX?*) - key provided. Many cleft defects are evident to the interviewer, but still the subject or the informant should be asked about each part of the defect (lip, alveolus, hard palate, and soft palate). Record a cleft uvula as a microform cleft of the soft palate. A cleft in the alveolus in addition to cleft palate should be recorded as a "cleft lip and palate." Question 2 is also asked of each subject (or informant regarding the subject) even if the subject does not have an orofacial cleft.
Tags:
Source: Regenstrief LOINC

Reference Documents:

ID:
Title:
URI:
Provider Org:
Language Code:
en-US
Document:
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), Oral Facial Cleft Study of Cleft Lip and Palate, Demographics and Medical History. Retrieved on April 23, 2009.
ID:
Title:
URI:
Provider Org:
Language Code:
en-US
Document:
Kriens, O. (1989). LAHSHAL. A concise documentation system for cleft lip, alveolus, and palate diagnoses. In O. Kriens (Ed.), What is a cleft lip and palate? A multidisciplinary update (pp. 30–34). Stuttgart, West Germany: Thieme.
ID:
Title:
URI:
Provider Org:
Language Code:
en-US
Document:
Mossey, P. A., Little, J., Munger, R. G., Dixon, M. J., & Shaw, W. C. (2009). Cleft lip and palate. Lancet, 374(9703), 1773–1785.
ID:
Title:
URI:
Provider Org:
Language Code:
en-US
Document:
Weinberg, S. M., Neiswanger, K., Martin, R. A., Mooney, M. P., Kane, A. A., Wenger, S. L., Losee, J., Deleyiannis, F., Ma, L., de Salamanca, J. E., Czeizel, A. E. & Marazita, M. L. (2006). The Pittsburgh Oral-Facial Cleft (POFC) Study: Expanding the cleft phenotype. Background and justification. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 43, 7–20.

Properties:

Key:
Related Names
Value:
Oral cleft lip or palate protoPanPanel
PANEL.PHENXPanlPnl
Point in timeRandom
Key:
Related Codes
Value:
Code SystemCodeCode TextCode Version
https://www.phenxtoolkit.org80501existence_of_cleft_lip_or_palate
Key:
Fully-Specified Name
Value:
ComponentPropertyTimeSystemScaleMethod
PhenX - oral health - existence of cleft lip or palate protocol 080501-Pt^Patient-PhenX
Key:
Basic Attributes
Value:
ClassTypeFirst ReleasedLast UpdatedChange ReasonPanel Type
PANEL.PHENXClinicalVersion 2.36Version 2.66Updated the PhenX ID from "PhenX." to "PX" in Survey Question Source field to align with the variable identifier used in the PhenX Toolkit.; Added the PhenX protocol ID to the Component to clearly define the protocol version for which this panel is based upon.Panel

Identifiers:

Source:
NLM
Id:
XyZSjMT2ol
Version:
2.1
Source:
LOINC
Id:
62586-3
Version:
2.69
Source:
PhenX
Id:
80501
Version: